Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance.
نویسندگان
چکیده
This is one of a series of BMJ summaries of new guidelines based on the best available evidence; they highlight important recommendations for clinical practice, especially where uncertainty or controversy exists. Further information about the guidance, a list of members of the guideline development group, and the supporting evidence statements are in the full version on bmj.com. Who needs risk assessment? • Consider assessing fracture risk in: – All women aged ≥65 years and men aged ≥75. – Women between 50 and 65 years and men between 50 and 75 years if they have risk factors—for example, previous fragility fracture; history of falls; current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids; other causes of secondary osteoporosis (box 1); smoking; alcohol intake >14 units a week for women and >21 units a week for men; family history of hip fracture; low body mass index (kg/m) (<18.5). • People aged <50 years are unlikely to be at high risk of fracture, so do not routinely assess their fracture risk with a risk assessment tool unless they have major risk factors (for example, current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids, untreated premature menopause, or previous fragility fracture). • In people aged <40 years, consider measuring bone mineral density to assess their fracture risk only if they have a major risk factor such as history of multiple fragility fractures, major osteoporotic fracture, or current or recent use of high dose oral or high dose systemic glucocorticoids (>7.5 mg prednisolone or equivalent daily for three months or longer). • Consider to be at high risk people over the age limit of the risk assessment tools (90 years for FRAX and 85 years for QFracture; box 2).
منابع مشابه
Risk assessment of fragility fracture: NICE guideline.
British Journal of General Practice, December 2012 667 INTRODUCTION Fragility fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture. The World Health Organization (WHO) has quantified this as forces equivalent to a fall from a standing height or less. Reduced bone density is a major risk factor for fragility fractures. The prevalence of osteoporosis increases mark...
متن کاملSecondary prevention of osteoporosis in non-neck of femur fragility fractures: is it value for money? A retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional cohort study
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is one of the commonest bone diseases in which bone fragility is increased. Over 300,000 patients present to hospitals in the UK with fragility fractures each year, with medical and social care costs - most of which relate to hip fracture care - at around £2 billion. The number of these fractures rises by 2% a year. The 30 days mortality is 10% and 30% at 1 year. The pur...
متن کاملFracture liaison services: improving outcomes for patients with osteoporosis
Fragility fractures are sentinels of osteoporosis, and as such all patients with low-trauma fractures should be considered for further investigation for osteoporosis and, if confirmed, started on osteoporosis medication. Fracture liaison services (FLSs) with varying models of care are in place to take responsibility for this investigative and treatment process. This review aims to describe outc...
متن کاملEXOGEN Ultrasound Bone Healing System for Long Bone Fractures with Non-Union or Delayed Healing: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
A routine part of the process for developing National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) medical technologies guidance is a submission of clinical and economic evidence by the technology manufacturer. The Birmingham and Brunel Consortium External Assessment Centre (EAC; a consortium of the University of Birmingham and Brunel University) independently appraised the submission on the...
متن کاملSeismic Fragility Assessment of Special Truss Moment Frames (STMF) Using the Capacity Spectrum Method
Fragility curves represent the probabilities that structural damages, under various levels of seismic excitation, will exceed the specified damage states by means of earthquake intensity damage relations. Conceptual aspects related to seismic vulnerability, damage and risk evaluation are discussed first, together with a short review of the most widely used possibilities for the seismic evaluati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ
دوره 345 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012